home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0795.doc
/
000076_owner-lightwave@webcom.com_Tue Jul 4 19:28:43 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-08-06
|
1KB
Received: by webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA182651323; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 19:28:43 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from earth.usa.net by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA182581319; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 19:28:39 -0700
Received: (from jgjones@localhost) by earth.usa.net (8.6.10/8.6.10) id UAA16097 for lightwave@webcom.com; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 20:29:42 -0600
From: James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <jgjones@usa.net>
Reply-To: James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <jgjones@usa.net>
Message-Id: <199507050229.UAA16097@earth.usa.net>
Subject: Windows NT 3.51?
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 1995 20:29:42 -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 289
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Anyone have any info comparing Windows NT 3.5 with the new 3.51 version?
Any improvements in LW rendering times, or better memory use? Is it worth
$89? (Seems a bit steep for a measly one one-hundreth of a whole number
upgrade... :)
-Jim
James G. Jones
Nibbles & Bits
jgjones@usa.net
--
James Jones/Nibbles and Bits <jgjones@usa.net> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com